Paper detail

Optimal photon budget allocation in E91 protocol

In order for the deployment of quantum communication technologies in a global scale, it is necessary to meet data exchange demand of various size establishments per certain time intervals and it is important to make them cost effective and feasible. In order to meet these requirements, a lot of effort has been put into increasing key rate and having optimized systems. In this study, we focus on the improvement of raw key rate in a standardized E91 QKD system without compromising its security. Our method is to optimize photon budget allocation among three types of bits used in the system for different purposes or occurred unavoidably. These three types of bits are key bits, Bell's inequality bits and discarded bits and their ratios were $25\%$, $50\%$ and $25\%$, respectively, in the proof-of-principle experiment. On the other hand, we present $226.22\%$ increase in raw key rate with $83\%$, $10\%$ and $7\%$ allocation of photon budget among three types of bits. These ratios are achieved by replacing $50:50$ beam splitters with a $90:10$ beam splitter at one communicating side and a $93:7$ beam splitter at the other communicating side. Additionally, we demonstrate that the optimum beam splitting ratios can vary depending on photon budget.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.