Paper detail

Optimal Online Algorithms for the Multi-Objective Time Series Search Problem

Tiedemann, et al. [Proc. of WALCOM, LNCS 8973, 2015, pp.210-221] defined multi-objective online problems (as an online version of multi-objective optimization problems) and the competitive analysis for multi-objective online problems and showed that (1) with respect to the worst component competitive analysis, the online algorithm RPP-HIGH is best possible for the multi-objective time series search~problem; (2) with respect to the arithmetic mean component competitive analysis, the online algorithm RPP-MULT is best possible for the bi-objective time series search problem; (3) with respect to the geometric mean component competitive analysis, the online algorithm RPP-MULT is best possible for the bi-objective time series search problem. In this paper, we first point out that the definitions and frameworks of the competitive analysis due to Tiedemann, et al. do not necessarily capture the efficiency of online algorithms for multi-objective online problems and provide modified definitions of the competitive analysis for multi-objective online problems. Then under the modified framework, we present a simple online algorithm Balanced Price Policy BPP_{k} for the multi-objective (k-objective) time series search problem, and show that the algorithm BPP_{k} is best possible with respect to any measure of the competitive analysis (defined by a monotone continuous function f). Under the modified framework, we derive exact values of the competitive ratio for the multi-objective time series search problem with respect to the worst component competitive analysis, the arithmetic mean component competitive analysis, and the geometric mean component competitive analysis.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.