Paper detail

Optimal minimization of the covariance loss

Let $X$ be a random vector valued in $\mathbb{R}^{m}$ such that $\|X\|_{2} \le 1$ almost surely. For every $k\ge 3$, we show that there exists a sigma algebra $\mathcal{F}$ generated by a partition of $\mathbb{R}^{m}$ into $k$ sets such that \[\|\operatorname{Cov}(X) - \operatorname{Cov}(\mathbb{E}[X\mid\mathcal{F}]) \|_{\mathrm{F}} \lesssim \frac{1}{\sqrt{\log{k}}}.\] This is optimal up to the implicit constant and improves on a previous bound due to Boedihardjo, Strohmer, and Vershynin. Our proof provides an efficient algorithm for constructing $\mathcal{F}$ and leads to improved accuracy guarantees for $k$-anonymous or differentially private synthetic data. We also establish a connection between the above problem of minimizing the covariance loss and the pinning lemma from statistical physics, providing an alternate (and much simpler) algorithmic proof in the important case when $X \in \{\pm 1\}^m/\sqrt{m}$ almost surely.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.