Paper detail

Optimal Leveraging of Smoothness and Strong Convexity for Peaceman--Rachford Splitting

In this paper, we introduce a simple methodology to leverage strong convexity and smoothness in order to obtain an optimal linear convergence rate for the Peaceman--Rachford splitting (PRS) scheme applied to optimization problems involving two smooth strongly convex functions. The approach consists of adding and subtracting suitable quadratic terms from one function to the other so as to redistribute strong convexity in the primal formulation and smoothness in the dual formulation. This yields an equivalent modified optimization problem in which each term has adjustable levels of strong convexity and smoothness. In this setting, the Peaceman--Rachford splitting method converges linearly to the solution of the modified problem with a convergence rate that can be optimized with respect to the introduced parameters. Upon returning to the original formulation, this procedure gives rise to a modified variant of PRS. The optimal linear rate established in this work is strictly better than the best rates previously available in the general setting. The practical performance of the method is illustrated through an academic example and applications in image processing.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.