Paper detail

Optimal Las Vegas reduction from one-way set reconciliation to error correction

Suppose we have two players $A$ and $C$, where player $A$ has a string $s[0..u-1]$ and player $C$ has a string $t[0..u-1]$ and none of the two players knows the other's string. Assume that $s$ and $t$ are both over an integer alphabet $[σ]$, where the first string contains $n$ non-zero entries. We would wish to answer to the following basic question. Assuming that $s$ and $t$ differ in at most $k$ positions, how many bits does player $A$ need to send to player $C$ so that he can recover $s$ with certainty? Further, how much time does player $A$ need to spend to compute the sent bits and how much time does player $C$ need to recover the string $s$? This problem has a certain number of applications, for example in databases, where each of the two parties possesses a set of $n$ key-value pairs, where keys are from the universe $[u]$ and values are from $[σ]$ and usually $n\ll u$. In this paper, we show a time and message-size optimal Las Vegas reduction from this problem to the problem of systematic error correction of $k$ errors for strings of length $Θ(n)$ over an alphabet of size $2^{Θ(\logσ+\log (u/n))}$. The additional running time incurred by the reduction is linear randomized for player $A$ and linear deterministic for player $B$, but the correction works with certainty. When using the popular Reed-Solomon codes, the reduction gives a protocol that transmits $O(k(\log u+\logσ))$ bits and runs in time $O(n\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(n)(\log u+\logσ))$ for all values of $k$. The time is randomized for player $A$ (encoding time) and deterministic for player $C$ (decoding time). The space is optimal whenever $k\leq (uσ)^{1-Ω(1)}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.