Paper detail

Optimal Label Splitting for Embedding an LTS into an arbitrary Petri Net Reachability Graph is NP-complete

For a given labelled transition system (LTS), synthesis is the task to find an unlabelled Petri net with an isomorphic reachability graph. Even when just demanding an embedding into a reachability graph instead of an isomorphism, a solution is not guaranteed. In such a case, label splitting is an option, i.e. relabelling edges of the LTS such that differently labelled edges remain different. With an appropriate label splitting, we can always obtain a solution for the synthesis or embedding problem. Using the label splitting, we can construct a labelled Petri net with the intended bahaviour (e.g. embedding the given LTS in its reachability graph). As the labelled Petri net can have a large number of transitions, an optimisation may be desired, limiting the number of labels produced by the label splitting. We show that such a limitation will turn the problem from being solvable in polynomial time into an NP-complete problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.