Optimal Infinity-Quasiconformal Immersions

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

For a Hamiltonian K∈C2(RN×n)K \in C^2(\mathbb{R}^{N \times n}) and a map u:Ω⊆Rn⟶RNu:Ω\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^N, we consider the supremal functional \[ \label{1} \tag{1} E_\infty (u,Ω) \ :=\ \big\|K(Du)\big\|_{L^\infty(Ω)} . \] The "Euler-Lagrange" PDE associated to \eqref{1} is the quasilinear system \[ \label{2} A_\infty u \, :=\, \Big(K_P \otimes K_P + K[K_P]^\bot K_{PP}\Big)(Du):D^2 u \, = \, 0. \tag{2} \] Here KPK_P is the derivative and [KP]⊥[K_P]^\bot is the projection on its nullspace. \eqref{1} and \eqref{2} are the fundamental objects of vector-valued Calculus of Variations in L∞L^\infty and first arose in recent work of the author \cite{K1}-\cite{K6}. Herein we apply our results to Geometric Analysis by choosing as KK the dilation function K(P)=∣P∣2det⁡(P⊤P)−1/n K(P)={|P|^2}{\det(P^\top P)^{-1/n}} which measures the deviation of uu from being conformal. Our main result is that appropriately defined minimisers of \eqref{1} solve \eqref{2}. Hence, PDE methods can be used to study optimised quasiconformal maps. Nonconvexity of KK and appearance of interfaces where [KP]⊥[K_P]^\bot is discontinuous cause extra difficulties. When n=Nn=N, this approach has previously been followed by Capogna-Raich \cite{CR} and relates to Teichmüller's theory. In particular, we disprove a conjecture appearing therein.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.