Paper detail

Optimal Folding of Data Flow Graphs based on Finite Projective Geometry using Lattice Embedding

A number of computations exist, especially in area of error-control coding and matrix computations, whose underlying data flow graphs are based on finite projective-geometry(PG) based balanced bipartite graphs. Many of these applications are actively being researched upon. Almost all these applications need bipartite graphs of the order of tens of thousands in practice, whose nodes represent parallel computations. To reduce its implementation cost, reducing amount of system/hardware resources during design is an important engineering objective. In this context, we present a scheme to reduce resource utilization when performing computations derived from PG-based graphs. In a fully parallel design based on PG concepts, the number of processing units is equal to the number of vertices, each performing an atomic computation. To reduce the number of processing units used for implementation, we present an easy way of partitioning the vertex set. Each block of partition is then assigned to a processing unit. A processing unit performs the computations corresponding to the vertices in the block assigned to it in a sequential fashion, thus creating the effect of folding the overall computation. These blocks have certain symmetric properties that enable us to develop a conflict-free schedule. The scheme achieves the best possible throughput, in lack of any overhead of shuffling data across memories while scheduling another computation on the same processing unit. This paper reports two folding schemes, which are based on same lattice embedding approach, based on partitioning. We first provide a scheme for a projective space of dimension five, and the corresponding schedules. Both the folding schemes that we present have been verified by both simulation and hardware prototyping for different applications. We later generalize this scheme to arbitrary projective spaces.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.