Paper detail

Optimal error bounds for nonexpansive fixed-point iterations in normed spaces

This paper investigates optimal error bounds and convergence rates for general Mann iterations for computing fixed-points of non-expansive maps. We look for iterations that achieve the smallest fixed-point residual after $n$ steps, by minimizing a worst-case bound $\|x^n-Tx^n\|\le R_n$ derived from a nested family of optimal transport problems. We prove that this bound is tight so that minimizing $R_n$ yields optimal iterations. Inspired from numerical results we identify iterations that attain the rate $R_n=O(1/n)$, which we also show to be the best possible. In particular, we prove that the classical Halpern iteration achieves this optimal rate for several alternative stepsizes, and we determine analytically the optimal stepsizes that attain the smallest worst-case residuals at every step $n$, with a tight bound $R_n\approx\frac{4}{n+4}$. We also determine the optimal Halpern stepsizes for affine non-expansive maps, for which we get exactly $R_n=\frac{1}{n+1}$. Finally, we show that the best rate for the classical Krasnosel'ski\uı-Mann iteration is $Ω(1/\sqrt{n})$, and present numerical evidence suggesting that even extended variants cannot reach a faster rate.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.