Paper detail

Optimal Energy Distribution with Energy Packet Networks

We use Energy Packet Network paradigms to investigate energy distribution problems in a computer system with energy harvesting and storages units. Our goal is to minimize both the overall average response time of jobs at workstations and the total rate of energy lost in the network. Energy is lost when it arrives at idle workstations which are empty. Energy is also lost in storage leakages. We assume that the total rate of energy harvesting and the rate of jobs arriving at workstations are known. We also consider a special case in which the total rate of energy harvesting is sufficiently large so that workstations are less busy. In this case, energy is more likely to be sent to an idle workstation. Optimal solutions are obtained which minimize both the overall response time and energy loss under the constraint of a fixed energy harvesting rate.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.