Paper detail

Optimal design of reinsurance contracts with a continuum of risk assessments

In this article, we employ a principal-agent model to analyze optimal contract design in a monopolistic reinsurance market under adverse selection with a continuum of insurer types. Instead of using the classical expected utility framework, we model each insurer's risk preference through their VaR at their chosen risk tolerance level. Under informational asymmetry, the reinsurer (principal) seeks to maximize expected profit by offering an optimal menu of reinsurance contracts to a continuum of insurers (agents) with hidden characteristics. To avoid the complexity of the traditional duality approach, which yields indirect multivariate utility functions, we introduce a change of variables that reduces the problem to a univariate one. We show that the optimal indirect utility for both stop-loss and quota-share reinsurance is in stop-loss form, implying that the reinsurer will classify agents into two risk groups-high and low-even in the continuum setting. Utilizing this new class of indirect utility functions, we fully solve the problem for three common reinsurance structures: stop-loss, quota-share, and change-loss. Numerical examples are also provided for illustrating the main findings.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.