Paper detail

Optimal compression of hash-origin prefix trees

There is a common problem of operating on hash values of elements of some database. In this paper there will be analyzed informational content of such general task and how to practically approach such found lower boundaries. Minimal prefix tree which distinguish elements turns out to require asymptotically only about 2.77544 bits per element, while standard approaches use a few times more. While being certain of working inside the database, the cost of distinguishability can be reduced further to about 2.33275 bits per elements. Increasing minimal depth of nodes to reduce probability of false positives leads to simple relation with average depth of such random tree, which is asymptotically larger by about 1.33275 bits than lg(n) of the perfect binary tree. This asymptotic case can be also seen as a way to optimally encode n large unordered numbers - saving lg(n!) bits of information about their ordering, which can be the major part of contained information. This ability itself allows to reduce memory requirements even to about 0.693 of required in Bloom filter for the same false positive probability.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.