Paper detail

Optimal bounds for approximate counting

Storing a counter incremented $N$ times would naively consume $O(\log N)$ bits of memory. In 1978 Morris described the very first streaming algorithm: the "Morris Counter". His algorithm's space bound is a random variable, and it has been shown to be $O(\log\log N + \log(1/\varepsilon) + \log(1/δ))$ bits in expectation to provide a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation with probability $1-δ$ to the counter's value. We provide a new simple algorithm with a simple analysis showing that randomized space $O(\log\log N + \log(1/\varepsilon) + \log\log(1/δ))$ bits suffice for the same task, i.e. an exponentially improved dependence on the inverse failure probability. We then provide a new analysis showing that the original Morris Counter itself, after a minor but necessary tweak, actually also enjoys this same improved upper bound. Lastly, we prove a new lower bound for this task showing optimality of our upper bound. We thus completely resolve the asymptotic space complexity of approximate counting. Furthermore all our constants are explicit, and our lower bound and tightest upper bound differ by a multiplicative factor of at most $3+o(1)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.