Abstract

We develop a general framework for data analysis and phenomenology of the CMB four-point function or trispectrum. To lowest order in the derivative expansion, the inflationary action admits three quartic operators consistent with symmetry: σ˙4\dotσ^4, σ˙2(∂σ2)\dotσ^2 (\partialσ^2), and (∂σ)4(\partialσ)^4. In single field inflation, only the first of these operators can be the leading non-Gaussian signal. A Fisher matrix analysis shows that there is one near-degeneracy among the three CMB trispectra, so we parameterize the trispectrum with two coefficients gNLσ˙4g_{NL}^{\dotσ^4} and gNL(∂σ)4g_{NL}^{(\partialσ)^4}, in addition to the coefficient gNLlocg_{NL}^{\rm loc} of ζ3ζ^3-type local non-Gaussianity. This three-parameter space is analogous to the parameter space (fNLloc,fNLequil,fNLorth)(f_{NL}^{\rm loc}, f_{NL}^{\rm equil}, f_{NL}^{\rm orth}) commonly used to parameterize the CMB three-point function. We next turn to data analysis and show how to represent these trispectra in a factorizable form which leads to computationally fast operations such as evaluating a CMB estimator or simulating a non-Gaussian CMB. We discuss practical issues in CMB analysis pipelines, and perform an optimal analysis of WMAP data. Our minimum-variance estimates are gNLloc=(−3.80±2.19)×105g_{NL}^{\rm loc} = (-3.80 \pm 2.19) \times 10^5, gNLσ˙4=(−3.20±3.09)×106g_{NL}^{\dotσ^4} = (-3.20 \pm 3.09) \times 10^6, and gNL(∂σ)4=(−10.8±6.33)×105g_{NL}^{(\partialσ)^4} = (-10.8 \pm 6.33) \times 10^5 after correcting for the effects of CMB lensing. No evidence of a nonzero inflationary four-point function is seen.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.