Paper detail

Optically faint X-ray sources in the CDFN: Spitzer constraints

We investigate the properties of the most optically faint sources in the GOODS-N area (R > 26.5 AB). Such extremely optically faint populations present an uncharted territory despite the fact that they represent an appreciable fraction of the X-ray sources in the GOODS-N field. They are believed to contain either red AGN at moderate redshifts or possibly QSO at very high redshift. We compile our sample by first finding the 3.6um IRAC counterparts of the X-ray sources and searching for the optical counterparts of the IRAC sources. 35 sources do not have counterparts in the R-band Subaru optical images. Of these, 18 have HST-ACS counterparts while the remaining have no optical counterparts. The vast majority of our 35 sources are classified as Extremely Red Objects (EROs) on the basis of their V-K lower limits. Their photometric redshifts show that these populate moderate redshifts (median z~2.8), being markedly different from the already spectroscopically identified population which peaks at z~0.7. The Spitzer-IRAC mid-IR colours of the sources which have no HST counterparts tend to lie within the mid-IR colour diagram AGN &#34;wedge&#34;, suggesting either QSO, ULIRG (Mrk231), or early-type galaxy templates at z>3. A large fraction of our sources (17/35), regardless of whether they have HST counterparts, can be classified as mid-IR bright/optically faint sources (Dust Obscured Galaxies) a class which is believed to include many heavily absorbed AGN. The co-added X-ray spectrum of the optically faint sources is very flat having a spectral index of Gamma~0.87, significantly flatter than the spectrum of the X-ray background. The optically faint R>26.5 X-ray sources constitute more than 50% of the total X-ray population at redshifts z>2 bearing important implications for the luminosity function and its evolution; considering X-ray sources with 2<z<4 we find good agreement with a modified PLE model.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.