Paper detail

Optical variability power spectrum analysis of blazar sources on intranight timescales

We report the first results of a systematic investigation to characterize blazar variability power spectral densities (PSDs) at optical frequencies using densely sampled (5--15 minutes integration time), high photometric accuracy ($\lesssim$0.2--0.5\%) R-band intranight light curves, covering timescales ranging from several hours to $\sim$15\,minutes. Our sample consists of 14 optically bright blazars, including nine BL Lacertae objects (BL Lacs) and five flat-spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs) which have shown statistically significant variability during 29 monitoring sessions. We model the intranight PSDs as simple power--laws and derive the best-fit slope along with uncertainty using the `power spectral response' method. Our main results are the following: (1) on 19 out of 29 monitoring sessions, the intranight PSDs show an acceptable fit to simple power-laws at the rejection confidence $\leq$ 90\%; (2) for these 19 instances, the PSD slopes show a large range from 1.4 to 4.0, consistent with statistical characters of red (slope$\sim$2) and black (slope$\geq$3) noise stochastic processes; (3) the average PSD slopes for the BL Lacs and FSRQs are indistinguishable from one another; (4) the normalization of intranight PSDs for individual blazar sources which were monitored on more than one occasion turns out to be consistent with one another with a few exceptions. The average PSD slope, 2.9$\pm$0.3 (1$σ$ uncertainty) is steeper than the red-noise type character of variability found on longer timescales (many decades to days), indicative of a cutoff in the variability spectrum on timescales around a few days at the synchrotron frequencies of the emission spectrum.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.