Paper detail

Optical spectroscopy of blazars for the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory- IV

Blazars, including BL Lacs and FSRQs, are the most luminous extragalactic γ-ray sources. They account for about 56% of the sources listed in the recent Fermi-LAT catalog (4FGL-DR4). The optical and UV spectra of BL Lacs are nearly featureless, making it difficult to precisely determine their redshifts. Consequently, nearly half of the γ-ray BL Lacs lack reliable redshift measurements. This poses a major challenge, since redshift is crucial for studying the cosmic evolution of the blazar population and γ-ray propagation studies such as indirect evidence of EBL, placing constraints on IGMF and searches for LIV and ALPs. This paper is the fourth in a series dedicated to determining the redshift of a sample of blazars identified as key targets for future observations with the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO). We performed Monte Carlo simulations to select γ-ray blazars detected by Fermi-LAT with hard spectra, that lack redshift measurements. These blazars are expected to be detectable by CTAO within 30 hours or less of exposure assuming an average flux state. In this fourth paper, we report the results of detailed spectroscopic observations of 29 blazars using the ESO/VLT, Keck II, and SALT telescopes. Our analysis involved a thorough search for spectral lines in the spectra of each blazar, and when features of the host galaxy were identified, we modeled its properties. We also compared the magnitudes of the targets during the observations to their long-term light curves. In the sample studied, 9 of 29 sources were observed with a high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N > 100), while the remaining 20 were observed with a moderate or low S/N. We successfully determined firm redshifts for 12 blazars, ranging from 0.1636 to 1.1427, and identified two lower limit redshifts at z > 1.0196 and z > 1.4454. The remaining 15 BL Lac objects exhibited featureless spectra.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.