Paper detail

Optical Observations and Modeling of the Superluminous Supernova 2018lfe

We present optical imaging and spectroscopy of SN\,2018lfe, which we classify as a Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) at a redshift of $z = 0.3501$ with a peak absolute magnitude of $M_r\approx -22.1$ mag, one of the brightest SLSNe discovered. SN\,2018lfe was identified for follow-up using our FLEET machine learning pipeline. Both the light curve and the spectra of SN\,2018lfe are consistent with the broad population of SLSNe. We fit the light curve with a magnetar central engine model and find an ejecta mass of $M_{\rm ej}\approx 3.8$ M$_\odot$, a magnetar spin period of $P\approx 2.9$ ms and a magnetic field strength of $B_{\perp}\approx 2.8\times 10^{14}$ G. The magnetic field strength is near the top of the distribution for SLSNe, while the spin period and ejecta mass are near the median values of the distribution for SLSNe. From late-time imaging and spectroscopy we find that the host galaxy of SN\,2018lfe has an absolute magnitude of $M_r\approx -17.85$, ($L_B \approx 0.029$ $L^*$), and an inferred metallicity of $Z\approx 0.3$ Z$_\odot$, and star formation rate of $\approx 0.8$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.