Paper detail

Optical Modulation in the X-Ray Binary 4U 1543-624 Revisited

The X-ray binary 4U 1543$-$624 has been provisionally identified as an ultracompact system with an orbital period of $\simeq$18~min. We have carried out time-resolved optical imaging of the binary to verify the ultra-short orbital period. Using 140\,min of high-cadence $r'$-band photometry we recover the previously-seen sinusoidal modulation and determine a period $P=18.20\pm0.09$\,min. In addition, we also see a 7.0$\times 10^{-4}$\,mag\,min$^{-1}$ linear decay, likely related to variations in the source's accretion activity. Assuming that the sinusoidal modulation arises from X-ray heating of the inner face of the companion star, we estimate a distance of 6.0--6.7\,kpc and an inclination angle of 34$^{\circ}$--61$^{\circ}$ (90\% confidence) for the binary. Given the stability of the modulation we can confirm that the modulation is orbital in origin and 4U 1543$-$624 is an ultracompact X-ray binary.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.