Paper detail

Optical interference in view of the probability distribution of photon detection

We investigate interference of optical fields by examining the probability distribution of photon detection. The usual description of interference patterns in terms of superposition of classical mean fields with definite phases is elucidated in quantum fashion. Especially, for interference of two independent mixtures of number states with Poissonian or sub-Poissonian statistics, despite lack of intrinsic phases, it is found that the joint probability has a distinct peak manifold in the multi-dimensional space of the detector outcomes, which is along the trajectory of the mean-field values as the relative phase varies on the unit circle. Then, an interference pattern should mostly appear in each shot of measurement as a point in the peak manifold with a randomly chosen relative phase. On the other hand, for super-Poissonian sources the mean-field description is likely invalidated with rather broad probability distributions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.