Paper detail

Optical Identification of a DNA-Wrapped Carbon Nanotube: Signs of Helically Broken Symmetry

High intrinsic mobility and small, biologically-compatible size make single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) in demand for the next generation of electronic devices. Further, the wide range of available bandgaps due to changes in diameter and symmetry give SWNTs greater versatility than traditional semiconductors. Single-stranded DNA has been employed to make these desirable properties accessible for large scale fabrication of devices. Because single-stranded DNA can helically wrap a SWNT, forming a stable hybrid structure, DNA/polymer wrapping has been used to disperse bundles of intrinsically hydrophobic SWNTs into individual tubes in aqueous solution. The ability to isolate individual tubes, make them soluble, and separate them according to symmetry would enable fabrication of SWNT optoelectronic devices that benefit from the unique electronic properties of specific nanotube structures. Envisioning optoelectronic applications of nanotubes, we investigate whether the optical properties of DNA-wrapped SWNT materials are different than those of pristine SWNTs. Our previous work found that bandstructures of DNA-SWNTs were indeed affected by the charged wrap. That is, the direct optical bandgap, $E_{11}$, decreases, but changes are fairly small. This is consistent with the available experimental data in standard experimental geometry in which incident light is polarized along the SWNT axis. Here we consider optical absorption of light with perpendicular (or circular) polarization with respect to the tube axis, which has been measured experimentally for SWNTs dispersed using a surfactant. In this geometry we find qualitative changes in the absorption spectra of SWNTs upon hybridization with DNA, including strong optical circular dichroism in non-chiral SWNTs.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.