Paper detail

Optical dropout galaxies lensed by the cluster A2667

We investigate the nature and the physical properties of z, Y and J-dropout galaxies selected behind the lensing cluster A2667. This field is part of our project aimed at identifying z~7-10 candidates accessible to spectroscopic studies, based on deep photometry with ESO/VLT HAWK-I and FORS2 (zYJH and Ks-band images, AB(3 sigma)~26-27) on a sample of lensing clusters extracted from our multi-wavelength combined surveys with SPITZER, HST, and Herschel. In this paper we focus on the complete Y and J-dropout sample, as well as the bright z-dropouts fulfilling the selection criteria by Capak et al. (2011). 10 candidates are selected within the common field of ~33 arcmin2 (effective area once corrected for contamination and lensing dilution). All of them are detected in H and Ks bands in addition to J and/or IRAC 3.6/4.5, with H(AB)~23.4 to 25.2, and have modest magnification factors. Although best-fit photometric redshifts place all these candidates at high-z, the contamination by low-z interlopers is estimated at 50-75% level based on previous studies, and the comparison with the blank-field WIRCAM Ultra-Deep Survey (WUDS). The same result is obtained when photometric redshifts include a luminosity prior, allowing us to remove half of the original sample as likely z~1.7-3 interlopers with young stellar pulations and strong extinction. Two additional sources among the remaining sample could be identified at low-z based on a detection at 24 microns and on the HST z_850 band. These low-z interlopers are not well described by current templates given the large break, and cannot be easily identified based solely on optical and near-IR photometry. Given the estimated dust extinction and high SFRs, some of them could be also detected in the IR or sub-mm bands. After correction for likely contaminants, the observed counts at z>7.5 seem to be in agreement with an evolving LF. (abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.