Paper detail

Optical Counterparts of ULXs in NGC 1672

In this work, we deploy archival data from {\it HST}, {\it Chandra}, {\it XMM-Newton}, and {\it Swift-XRT}, to probe the nature of 9 candidate ULXs in NGC 1672. Specifically, our study focuses on using the precise source positions obtained via improved astrometry based on {\it Chandra} and {\it HST} observations to search for and identify potential optical counterparts for these ULXs. Unique optical counterparts are identified for two of the ULX candidates i.e., X2 and X6; for three of the candidates i.e., X1, X5 and X7, we found two potential counterparts for each source within the respective error radii. No optical counterparts were found for the remaining four sources. The spectral energy distribution of X2 is fitted to a blackbody spectrum with a temperature of $\sim$ 10$^{4}$K and the spectral class of the source is determined to be B7$-$A3, a supergiant donor star. We used colour magnitude diagrams (CMDs) to investigate ages of the counterparts. Of all the sources studied, X9 exhibits the most variability whereby the X-ray flux varies by a factor of $\sim$ 50 over a time period spanning 2004 to 2019, and also traces a partial q-curve-like feature in the hardness-intensity diagram, hinting at possible spectral transitions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.