Paper detail

Optical counterparts of two ULXs in NGC5474 and NGC3627 (M66)

We identified two optical counterparts of brightest ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULXs) in galaxies NGC5474 and NGC3627 (M66). The counterparts in Hubble Space Telescope images are very faint, their V magnitudes are 24.7 ($M_V \approx -4.5$) and 25.9 ($M_V \approx -4.2$), respectively. NGC5474 X-1 changes the X-ray flux more than two orders of magnitude, in its bright state it has $L_X \approx 1.6 \times 10^{40}$ erg/s, the spectrum is best fitted by an absorbed power-law model with a photon index $Γ\approx 0.94$. M66 X-1 varies in X-rays with a factor of ~2.5, its maximal luminosity being $2.0 \times 10^{40}$ erg/s with $Γ\approx 1.7$. Optical spectroscopy of the NGC5474 X-1 has shown a blue spectrum, which however was contaminated by a nearby star of 23 mag, but the counterpart has a redder spectrum. Among other objects captured by the slit are a background emission-line galaxy (z=0.359) and a new young cluster of NGC5474. We find that these two ULXs have largest X-ray-to-optical ratios of $L_X/L_{opt}$ ~ 7000 for NGC5474 X-1 (in its bright state) and 8000 for M66 X-1 both with the faintest optical counterparts ever measured. Probably their optical emission originates from the donor star. If they have super-Eddington accretion discs with stellar-mass black holes, they may also have the lowest mass accretion rates among ULXs such as in M81 X-6 and NGC1313 X-1.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.