Paper detail

Optical and X-ray properties of the RIXOS AGN: II - Emission lines

We present the optical and UV emission line properties of 160 X-ray selected AGN taken from the RIXOS survey (including Halpha, Hbeta, [OIII]5007, MgII2798 and CIII]1909). This sample is believed to contain a mixture of absorbed and unabsorbed objects, with column densities up to 4e21 cm-2. Although the distribution of the [OIII] EW for the RIXOS AGN is typical of optically selected samples, the Balmer line EWs are relatively low. This is consistent with the presence of a dust absorber between the broad and narrow line regions (eg. a molecular torus), and intrinsically weak optical line emission. We find Baldwin effects in CIII] and MgII, and a positive response of the MgII line to its ionizing continuum. There is a strong correlation between the EW and FWHM of MgII, which may be similar to that seen in other samples for Hbeta. We demonstrate that this is consistent with models which suggest two line-emitting zones, a `very broad line region' (VBLR) and an `intermediate line region' (ILR). The correlation between EW and FWHM in MgII may be a physical characteristic of the ILR or it may reflect a geometric dependence. We found no correlation between the Hbeta FWHM and the slope of the X-ray spectrum, however this may be due to the effects of dust absorption which suppresses the broad Hbeta component, masking any relationship. The Halpha FWHM does tend to be narrow when alpha_X is soft, and broadens as alpha_X hardens, although the formal probability for this correlation is low (91 per cent). If the distribution of alpha_X in the RIXOS sample reflects the level of intrinsic absorption in these AGN, the data suggest a possible link between the velocity of the Balmer line-emitting region and the amount of absorbing material beyond.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.