Paper detail

Optical and NIR data and modelling of nova V5668 Sgr

We present HST optical images, Keck-OSIRIS NIR IFS data cubes and Keck-NIRC2 NIR images of nova V5668 Sgr from 2016 to 2019. The observations indicate enhanced emission at the polar caps and equatorial torus for low ionization lines, and enhanced high ionization emission lines only at the polar caps. The radial velocities are compatible with a homogeneous expansion velocity of v=590 km s$^{-1}$ and a system inclination angle of 24$^o$. These values were used to estimate an expansion parallax distance of 1200 $\pm$ 400 pc. The NIRC2 data indicate the presence of dust in 2016 and 2017, but no dust emission could be detected in 2019. The observational data were used for assembling 3D photoionization models of the ejecta. The model results indicate that the central source has a temperature of $1.88\times10^{5}$ K and a luminosity of $1.6\times10^{35}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in August of 2017 (2.4 years post eruption), and that the shell has a mass of $6.3\times10^{-5}$ M$_{\odot}$. The models also suggest an anisotropy of the ionizing flux, possibly by the contribution from a luminous accretion disc.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.