Paper detail

Optical and J,K-photometry of black hole X-ray nova A0620-00 in passive and active stages of quiescence

Photometric observations of the low-mass X-ray binary system A0620-00=V616 Mon are performed in the optical (unfiltered light, lambda_eff~6400A) and the near-infrared J and K-bands. The mean system flux, the orbital light curve shape and the flickering amplitude dependences on wavelength are examined for two activity stages of the system remaining in quiescence. In 2015-16 A0620-00 was in passive stage (as by Cantrell et al., 2008) exhibiting the regular orbital light curves and low flickering. In less than 230 days in 2016-17 the system switched into active stage: the brightness increased by ~0.2-0.3 mag, the orbital light curve changed while the flickering amplitude increased more than twice. The object regular orbital light curves were fitted by models with "cold" spots on the optical star surface and without those. These models reproduce the observed orbital light curves both in passive and in active stages. The dependence of the mean square flickering amplitude (in fluxes, extinction corrected) on wavelength is computed in the lambda 6400-22000AA range. In active stage, the observed flickering amplitude decreases over the whole studied range and may be represented as Delta F_fl~lambda^{-2} which corresponds to the free-free emission of optically thin high-temperature plasma. In passive stage, flickering obeys Delta F_fl~lambda^{-4} law in the range 6400-12500AA that corresponds to the thermal radiation of optically thick high-temperature plasma. At longer wavelengths the flickering amplitude dependence is flat which may imply existence of a synchrotron component of the relativistic jets emission. These flickering features let us propose that the flickering mechanism includes at least two components: thermal and, apparently, synchrotron, that agrees with the recent discovery of the variable linear polarization of the IR system emission (Russell et al., 2016).

preprint2017arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.