Paper detail

Opinion dynamics involving contrarian and independence behaviors based on the Sznajd model with two-two and three-one agent interactions

We investigate the opinion evolution of outflow dynamics based on the Sznajd model on a complete graph involving contrarian and independence behaviors. We consider a group of four spins representing the social agents with the following scenarios: (1) scenario two-two with contrarian agents or independence agents and (2) scenario three-one with contrarian or independence agents. All of them undergo a second-order phase transition according to our simulation. The critical point decreases exponentially as $λ$ and $f$ increases, where $λ$ and $f$ are contrarian and flexibility factors, respectively. Furthermore, we find that the critical point of scenario three-one is smaller than that of scenario two-two. For the same level of $λ$ and $f$, the critical point of the scenario involving independence is smaller than the scenario with contrarian agents. From a sociophysics point of view, we observe that scenario three-one can likely reach a stalemate situation rather than scenario two-two. Surprisingly, the scenarios involving contrarians have a higher probability of achieving a consensus than a scenario involving independence. Our estimates of the critical exponents indicate that the model is still in the same universality class as the mean-field Ising model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.