Paper detail

Operator analysis of effective spin-flavor interactions for L=1 excited baryons

We match the non-relativistic quark model, with both flavor dependent and flavor independent effective quark-quark interactions, to the spin-flavor operator basis of the 1/Nc expansion for the L=1 non-strange baryons. We obtain analytic expressions for the coefficients of the 1/Nc operators in terms of radial integrals that depend on the shape and relative strength of the spin-spin, spin-orbit and tensor interactions of the model, which are left unspecified. We obtain several new, parameter-free relations between the seven masses and the two mixing angles that can discriminate between different spin-flavor structures of the effective quark-quark interaction. We discuss in detail how a general parametrization of the mass matrix depends on the mixing angles and is constrained by the assumptions on the effective quark-quark interaction. We find that, within the present experimental uncertainties, consistency with the best values of the mixing angles as determined by a recent global fit to masses and decays does not exclude any of the two most extreme possibilities of flavor dependent (independent) quark-quark interactions, as generated by meson (gluon) exchange interactions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.