Paper detail

Openness, Holder metric regularity and Holder continuity properties of semialgebraic set-valued maps

Given a semialgebraic set-valued map $F \colon \mathbb{R}^n \rightrightarrows \mathbb{R}^m$ with closed graph, we show that the map $F$ is Holder metrically subregular and that the following conditions are equivalent: (i) $F$ is an open map from its domain into its range and the range of $F$ is locally closed; (ii) the map $F$ is Holder metrically regular; (iii) the inverse map $F^{-1}$ is pseudo-Holder continuous; (iv) the inverse map $F^{-1}$ is lower pseudo-Holder continuous. An application, via Robinson's normal map formulation, leads to the following result in the context of semialgebraic variational inequalities: if the solution map (as a map of the parameter vector) is lower semicontinuous then the solution map is finite and pseudo-Hölder continuous. In particular, we obtain a negative answer to a question mentioned in the paper of Dontchev and Rockafellar \cite{Dontchev1996}. As a byproduct, we show that for a (not necessarily semialgebraic) continuous single-valued map from $\mathbb{R}^n$ to $\mathbb{R},$ the openness and the non-extremality are equivalent. This fact improves the main result of Pühn \cite{Puhl1998}, which requires the convexity of the map in question.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.