Paper detail

Open windows for a light axigluon explanation of the top forward-backward asymmetry

The top forward-backward asymmetry (tAFB) measured at the Tevatron remains one of the most puzzling outstanding collider anomalies. After two years of LHC running, however, few models for tAFB remain consistent with LHC data. In this paper we take a detailed look at the most promising surviving class of models, namely light (m_G' <~ 450 GeV), broad axigluons. We show which models simultaneously satisfy constraints from Tevatron and LHC top measurements, hadronic resonance searches, and LEP precision electroweak (PEW) observables. We consider three flavor structures: flavor-universal; down-type nonuniversal, designed to ease constraints from LHC charge asymmetry measurements; and top-type nonuniversal, designed to ameliorate constraints from PEW. We compute contributions to the PEW observables from states in the minimal UV completion of the axigluon model and demonstrate that new heavy fermions make the constraints universally more stringent, while related contributions from new scalars are much smaller, but act to relax the constraints. Paired dijet searches from ATLAS and CMS rule out all narrow axiglue models, while the LHC charge asymmetry measurement is less constraining than expected due to the high central value measured by ATLAS. Excepting the tension with the CMS charge asymmetry measurement, a broad axigluon is consistent with all data over the entire mass range we consider (50 GeV <~m_G' <~450 GeV) in the flavor-universal and top-type nonuniversal models, while it is consistent for m_G' >~200 GeV in the down-type non-universal model. The LHC charge asymmetry remains the best avenue for excluding, or observing, these models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.