Paper detail

Open chemical reaction networks, steady-state loads and Braess-like paradox

Open chemical reaction systems involve matter-exchange with the surroundings. As a result, species can accumulate inside a system during the course of the reaction. We study the role of network topology in governing the concentration build-up inside a fixed reaction volume at steady state, particularly focusing on the effect of additional paths. The problem is akin to that in traffic networks where an extra route, surprisingly, can increase the overall travel time. This is known as the Braess' paradox. Here, we report chemical analogues of such a paradox in suitably chosen reaction networks, where extra reaction step(s) can inflate the total concentration, denoted as `load', at steady state. It is shown that, such counter-intuitive behavior emerges in a qualitatively similar pattern in networks of varying complexities. We then explore how such extra routes affect the load in a biochemical scheme of uric acid degradation. From a thorough analysis of this network, we propose a functional role of some decomposition steps that can trim the load, indicating the importance of the latter in the evolution of reaction mechanisms in living matter.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.