Paper detail

Onset of oligarchic growth and implication for accretion histories of dwarf planets

We investigate planetary accretion that starts from equal-mass planetesimals using an analytic theory and numerical simulations. We particularly focus on how the planetary mass $M_{\rm oli}$ at the onset of oligarchic growth depends on the initial mass $m_0$ of a planetesimal. Oligarchic growth commences when the velocity dispersion relative to the Hill velocity of the protoplanet takes its minimum. We find that if $m_0$ is small enough, this normalized velocity dispersion becomes as low as unity during the intermediate stage between the runaway and oligarchic growth stages. In this case, $M_{\rm oli}$ is independent of $m_0$. If $m_0$ is large, on the other hand, oligarchic growth commences directly after runaway growth, and $M_{\rm oli} \propto m_0^{3/7}$. The planetary mass $M_{\rm oli}$ for the solid surface density of the Minimum Mass Solar Nebula is close to the masses of the dwarf planets in a reasonable range of $m_0$. This indicates that they are likely to be the largest remnant planetesimals that failed to become planets. The power-law exponent $q$ of the differential mass distribution of remnant planetesimals is typically $-2.0$ and $-2.7$ to $-2.5$ for small and large $m_0$. The slope, $q \simeq -2.7$, and the bump at $10^{21}$ g (or 50 km in radius) for the mass distribution of hot Kuiper belt objects are reproduced if $m_0$ is the bump mass. On the other hand, small initial planetesimals with $m_0 \sim 10^{13}$ g or less are favored to explain the slope of large asteroids, $q \simeq -2.0$, while the bump at $10^{21}$ g can be reproduced by introducing a small number of asteroid seeds each with mass of $10^{19} $ g.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.