Paper detail

Onsager-variational formulation of diffuse-domain methods for computational modeling of microscale fluid-structure interactions

Direct numerical simulation of microscale fluid--structure interactions in multicomponent and multiphase flows requires methods that can represent moving boundaries together with fields constrained to evolving interfaces. Diffuse-domain methods (DDMs) address this geometric difficulty by replacing sharp surfaces with diffuse volumetric representations on regular computational domains. Here we formulate DDMs using Onsager's variational principle. Instead of extending sharp-interface equations and boundary conditions term by term, we embed sharp-surface free-energy and dissipation functionals into the bulk through a diffuse surface delta density and derive the governing equations from the Rayleighian. The framework distinguishes balance-law fields, internal nonconserved order parameters, and kinematic or constitutive rate variables. It also clarifies a key moving-surface distinction: conserved surface densities are transported by the full material surface velocity, whereas explicitly tangential vector and tensor internal variables require projected objective or co-rotational rates within their admissible tangential state spaces. For scalar transport on rigid and deformable interfaces, and for interfacial hydrodynamics near rigid walls, the formulation recovers established DDM models and their sharp-interface limits. The same variational construction yields coupled diffuse-domain models for multicomponent deformable vesicles with surface viscosity, tangential slip, and finite areal compressibility, and for active shells carrying chemical and tangential vector order. These results provide a unified route to thermodynamically consistent passive DDMs for interfacial and surface dynamics, while allowing active stresses through active work power. The framework is relevant to soft matter, microfluidic interfaces, biological membranes, and morphogenetic surface dynamics.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.