Paper detail

Online Scheduling on Identical Machines using SRPT

Due to its optimality on a single machine for the problem of minimizing average flow time, Shortest-Remaining-Processing-Time (\srpt) appears to be the most natural algorithm to consider for the problem of minimizing average flow time on multiple identical machines. It is known that $\srpt$ achieves the best possible competitive ratio on multiple machines up to a constant factor. Using resource augmentation, $\srpt$ is known to achieve total flow time at most that of the optimal solution when given machines of speed $2- \frac{1}{m}$. Further, it is known that $\srpt$&#39;s competitive ratio improves as the speed increases; $\srpt$ is $s$-speed $\frac{1}{s}$-competitive when $s \geq 2- \frac{1}{m}$. However, a gap has persisted in our understanding of $\srpt$. Before this work, the performance of $\srpt$ was not known when $\srpt$ is given $(1+\eps)$-speed when $0 < \eps < 1-\frac{1}{m}$, even though it has been thought that $\srpt$ is $(1+\eps)$-speed $O(1)$-competitive for over a decade. Resolving this question was suggested in Open Problem 2.9 from the survey &#34;Online Scheduling&#34; by Pruhs, Sgall, and Torng \cite{PruhsST}, and we answer the question in this paper. We show that $\srpt$ is \emph{scalable} on $m$ identical machines. That is, we show $\srpt$ is $(1+\eps)$-speed $O(\frac{1}{\eps})$-competitive for $\eps >0$. We complement this by showing that $\srpt$ is $(1+\eps)$-speed $O(\frac{1}{\eps^2})$-competitive for the objective of minimizing the $\ell_k$-norms of flow time on $m$ identical machines. Both of our results rely on new potential functions that capture the structure of \srpt. Our results, combined with previous work, show that $\srpt$ is the best possible online algorithm in essentially every aspect when migration is permissible.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.