Paper detail

Online Monitoring of Global Attitudes Towards Wildlife

Human factors are increasingly recognised as central to conservation of biodiversity. Despite this, there are no existing systematic efforts to monitor global trends in perceptions of wildlife. With traditional news reporting now largely online, the internet presents a powerful means to monitor global attitudes towards species. In this work we develop a method using the Global Database of Events, Language, and Tone (GDELT) to scan global news media, allowing us to identify and download conservation-related articles. Applying supervised machine learning techniques, we filter irrelevant articles to create a continually updated global dataset of news coverage for seven target taxa: lion, tiger, saiga, rhinoceros, pangolins, elephants, and orchids, and observe that over two-thirds of articles matching a simple keyword search were irrelevant. We examine coverage of each taxa in different regions, and find that elephants, rhinos, tigers, and lions receive the most coverage, with daily peaks of around 200 articles. Mean sentiment was positive for all taxa, except saiga for which it was neutral. Coverage was broadly distributed, with articles from 73 countries across all continents. Elephants and tigers received coverage in the most countries overall, whilst orchids and saiga were mentioned in the smallest number of countries. We further find that sentiment towards charismatic megafauna is most positive in non-range countries, with the opposite being true for pangolins and orchids. Despite promising results, there remain substantial obstacles to achieving globally representative results. Disparities in internet access between low and high income countries and users is a major source of bias, with the need to focus on a diversity of data sources and languages, presenting sizable technical challenges...

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.