Paper detail

Online MinCut: Competitive and Regret Analysis

In this paper we study the mincut problem in the online setting. We consider two distinct models: A) competitive analysis and B) regret analysis. In the competitive setting we consider the vertex arrival model; whenever a new vertex arrives it's neighborhood with respect to the set of known vertices is revealed. An online algorithm must make an irrevocable decision to determine the side of the cut that the vertex must belong to in order to minimize the size of the final cut. Various models are considered. 1) For classical and advice models we give tight bounds on the competitive ratio of deterministic algorithms. 2) Next we consider few semi-adversarial inputs: random order of arrival with adversarially generated and sparse graphs. 3) Lastly we derive some structural properties of \mc-type problems with respect to greedy strategies. Finally we consider a non-stationary regret setting with a variational budget $V_T$ and give tights bounds on the regret function. Specifically, we show that if $V_T$ is sublinear in $T$ (number of rounds) then there is a deterministic algorithm achieving a sublinear regret bound ($O(V_T)$). Further, this is optimal, even if randomization is allowed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.