Abstract

The online list labeling problem is an algorithmic primitive with a large literature of upper bounds, lower bounds, and applications. The goal is to store a dynamically-changing set of nn items in an array of mm slots, while maintaining the invariant that the items appear in sorted order, and while minimizing the relabeling cost, defined to be the number of items that are moved per insertion/deletion. For the linear regime, where m=(1+Θ(1))nm = (1 + Θ(1)) n, an upper bound of O(log⁡2n)O(\log^2 n) on the relabeling cost has been known since 1981. A lower bound of Ω(log⁡2n)Ω(\log^2 n) is known for deterministic algorithms and for so-called smooth algorithms, but the best general lower bound remains Ω(log⁡n)Ω(\log n). The central open question in the field is whether O(log⁡2n)O(\log^2 n) is optimal for all algorithms. In this paper, we give a randomized data structure that achieves an expected relabeling cost of O(log⁡3/2n)O(\log^{3/2} n) per operation. More generally, if m=(1+ε)nm = (1 + \varepsilon) n for ε=O(1)\varepsilon = O(1), the expected relabeling cost becomes O(ε−1log⁡3/2n)O(\varepsilon^{-1} \log^{3/2} n). Our solution is history independent, meaning that the state of the data structure is independent of the order in which items are inserted/deleted. For history-independent data structures, we also prove a matching lower bound: for all εε between 1/n1/31 / n^{1/3} and some sufficiently small positive constant, the optimal expected cost for history-independent list-labeling solutions is Θ(ε−1log⁡3/2n)Θ(\varepsilon^{-1}\log^{3/2} n).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.