Paper detail

Online Exploration of Rectangular Grids

In this paper, we consider the problem of exploring unknown environments with autonomous agents. We model the environment as a graph with edge weights and analyze the task of visiting all vertices of the graph at least once. The hardness of this task heavily depends on the knowledge and the capabilities of the agent. In our model, the agent sees the whole graph in advance, but does not know the weights of the edges. As soon as it arrives in a vertex, it can see the weights of all the outgoing edges. We consider the special case of two different edge weights $1$ and $k$ and prove that the problem remains hard even in this case. We prove a lower bound of $11/9$ on the competitive ratio of any deterministic strategy for exploring a ladder graph and complement this result by a $4$-competitive algorithm. All of these results hold for undirected graphs. Exploring directed graphs, where the direction of the edges is not known beforehand, seems to be much harder. Here, we prove that a natural greedy strategy has a linear lower bound on the competitive ratio both in ladders and square grids.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.