Paper detail

Online and Random-order Load Balancing Simultaneously

We consider the problem of online load balancing under lp-norms: sequential jobs need to be assigned to one of the machines and the goal is to minimize the lp-norm of the machine loads. This generalizes the classical problem of scheduling for makespan minimization (case l_infty) and has been thoroughly studied. However, despite the recent push for beyond worst-case analyses, no such results are known for this problem. In this paper we provide algorithms with simultaneous guarantees for the worst-case model as well as for the random-order (i.e. secretary) model, where an arbitrary set of jobs comes in random order. First, we show that the greedy algorithm (with restart), known to have optimal O(p) worst-case guarantee, also has a (typically) improved random-order guarantee. However, the behavior of this algorithm in the random-order model degrades with p. We then propose algorithm SIMULTANEOUSLB that has simultaneously optimal guarantees (within constants) in both worst-case and random-order models. In particular, the random-order guarantee of SIMULTANEOUSLB improves as p increases. One of the main components is a new algorithm with improved regret for Online Linear Optimization (OLO) over the non-negative vectors in the lq ball. Interestingly, this OLO algorithm is also used to prove a purely probabilistic inequality that controls the correlations arising in the random-order model, a common source of difficulty for the analysis. Another important component used in both SIMULTANEOUSLB and our OLO algorithm is a smoothing of the lp-norm that may be of independent interest. This smoothness property allows us to see algorithm SIMULTANEOUSLB as essentially a greedy one in the worst-case model and as a primal-dual one in the random-order model, which is instrumental for its simultaneous guarantees.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.