Paper detail

One-point probability distribution function from spherical collapse: Early Dark Energy (EDE) vs. $Λ$CDM

We compute the one-point PDF of an initially Gaussian dark matter density field using spherical collapse (SC). We compare the results to other forms available in the literature and also compare the PDFs in the $Λ$CDM model with an early dark energy (EDE) model. We find that the skewed log-normal distribution provides the best fit to the non-linear PDF from SC for both cosmologies, from $a=0.1$ to 1 and for scales characterized by the comoving width of the Gaussian: $σ_G = 0.5, 1, 2$. To elucidate the effect of cosmology, we examine the linear and non-linear growth rates through test cases. For overdensities, when the two models have the same initial density contrast, the differences due to cosmology are amplified in the non-linear regime, whereas, if the two models have the same linear density contrast today, then the differences in cosmology are damped in the non-linear regime. This behaviour is in contrast with voids, where the non-linear growth becomes `self-regulatory' and is less sensitive to cosmology and initial conditions. To compare the PDFs, we examine the difference of the PDFs and evolution of the width of the PDF. The trends with scale and redshift are as expected. A tertiary aim of this paper was to check if the fitting form for the non-linear density-velocity divergence relation, derived for constant equation of state ($w$) models by Nadkarni-Ghosh holds for the EDE model. We find that it does with an accuracy of 4\%, thus increasing its range of validity.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.