Paper detail

One-photon absorption by inorganic perovskite nanocrystals: A theoretical study

The one-photon absorption cross section of nanocrystals (NCs) of the inorganic perovskite CsPbBr$_{3}$ is studied theoretically using a multiband $\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{p}$ envelope-function model combined with a treatment of intercarrier correlation by many-body perturbation theory. A confined exciton is described first within the Hartree-Fock (HF) approximation, and correlation between the electron and hole is then included in leading order by computing the first-order vertex correction to the electron-photon interaction. The vertex correction is found to give an enhancement of the near-threshold absorption cross section by a factor of up to 4 relative to the HF (mean-field) value of the cross section, for NCs with an edge length $L=9$-12 nm (regime of intermediate confinement). The vertex-correction enhancement factors are found to decrease with increasing exciton energy; the absorption cross section for photons of energy $ω=3.1$ eV (about 0.7 eV above threshold) is enhanced by a factor of only 1.4-1.5 relative to the HF value. The $\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{p}$ corrections to the absorption cross section are also significant; they are found to increase the cross section at an energy $ω=3.1$ eV by about 30% relative to the value found in the effective-mass approximation. The theoretical absorption cross section at $ω=3.1$ eV, assuming a Kane parameter $E_{P}=20$ eV, is found to be intermediate among the set of measured values (which vary among themselves by nearly an order of magnitude) and to obey a power-law dependence $σ^{(1)}(ω)\propto L^{2.9}$ on the NC edge length $L$, in good agreement with experiment. The dominant contribution to the theoretical exponent 2.9 is shown to be the density of final-state excitons. The main theoretical uncertainty in these calculations is in the value of the Kane parameter $E_{P}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.