Paper detail

One idea and two proofs of the KMT theorems

Two proofs of the Komlós-Major-Tusnády embedding theorems, one for the uniform empirical process and one for the simple symmetric random walk, are given. More precisely, what are proved are the univariate coupling results needed in the proofs, such as Tusnády's lemma. These proofs are modifications of existing proof architectures, one combinatorial (the original proof with many modifications, due to Csörgõ, Révész, Bretagnolle, Massart, Dudley, Carter, Pollard etc.) and one analytical (due to Sourav Chatterjee). There is one common idea to both proofs: we compare binomial and hypergeometric distributions among themselves, rather than with the Gaussian distribution. In the combinatorial approach, this involves comparing Binomial(n,1/2) distribution with the Binomial(4n,1/2) distribution, which mainly involves comparison between the corresponding binomial coefficients. In the analytical approach, this reduces Chatterjee's method to coupling nearest neighbour Markov chains on integers so that they stay close.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.