Paper detail

On what Terms and why the Thermodynamic Properties of Polymer Solutions Depend on Chain Length up to the Melt

Theoretical considerations based on chain connectivity and conformational variability of polymers have lead to an uncomplicated relation for the dependence of the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, chi, on the volume fraction of the polymer, phi, and on its number of segments, N. The validity of this expression is being tested extensively by means of vapor pressure measurements and inverse gas chromatography (complemented by osmotic and light scattering data from literature) for solutions of poly(dimethylsiloxane) in the thermodynamically vastly different solvents n-octane (n-C8), toluene (TL), and methylethylketone (MEK) over the entire range of composition for at least six different molecular masses of the polymer. The new approach is capable to model the measured chi (phi, N) very well, irrespective of the thermodynamic quality of the solvent, in contrast to traditional expressions, which are often restricted to good solvents but fail for bad ones and vice versa. At constant polymer concentration the chi values result lowest for n-C8 (best solvent) and highest for MEK (theta solvent); the data for TL fall between. The influences of N depend strongly on the thermodynamic quality of the solvent and are not restricted to dilute solutions. For good solvents chi increases with rising N. The effect is most pronounced for n-C8, where the different curves for chi (phi) fan out considerably. The influences of N become less distinct for TL, and for MEK they vanish at the (endothermal) theta temperature. For worse than theta conditions, the chi values of the long chains become less than that of short ones. This change in the sign of N-influences is in agreement with the present concept of conformational relaxation.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.