Paper detail

On Variants of the Matroid Secretary Problem

We present a number of positive and negative results for variants of the matroid secretary problem. Most notably, we design a constant-factor competitive algorithm for the "random assignment" model where the weights are assigned randomly to the elements of a matroid, and then the elements arrive on-line in an adversarial order (extending a result of Soto \cite{Soto11}). This is under the assumption that the matroid is known in advance. If the matroid is unknown in advance, we present an $O(\log r \log n)$-approximation, and prove that a better than $O(\log n / \log \log n)$ approximation is impossible. This resolves an open question posed by Babaioff et al. \cite{BIK07}. As a natural special case, we also consider the classical secretary problem where the number of candidates $n$ is unknown in advance. If $n$ is chosen by an adversary from $\{1,...,N\}$, we provide a nearly tight answer, by providing an algorithm that chooses the best candidate with probability at least $1/(H_{N-1}+1)$ and prove that a probability better than $1/H_N$ cannot be achieved (where $H_N$ is the $N$-th harmonic number).

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.