Paper detail

On Uniform f-vectors of Cutsets in the Truncated Boolean Lattice

Let $[n] = \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ and let $2^{[n]}$ be the collection of all subsets of $[n]$ ordered by inclusion. ${\cal C} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is a {\em cutset} if it meets every maximal chain in $2^{[n]}$, and the {\em width} of ${\cal C} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is the minimum number of chains in a chain decomposition of ${\cal C}$. Fix $0 \leq m \leq l \leq n$. What is the smallest value of $k$ such that there exists a cutset that consists only of subsets of sizes between $m$ and $l$, and such that it contains exactly $k$ subsets of size $i$ for each $m \leq i \leq l$? The answer, which we denote by $g_n(m,l)$, gives a lower estimate for the width of a cutset between levels $m$ and $l$ in $2^{[n]}$. After using the Kruskal-Katona Theorem to give a general characterization of cutsets in terms of the number and sizes of their elements, we find lower and upper bounds (as well as some exact values) for $g_n(m,l)$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.