Paper detail

On U-Statistics and Compressed Sensing II: Non-Asymptotic Worst-Case Analysis

In another related work, U-statistics were used for non-asymptotic "average-case" analysis of random compressed sensing matrices. In this companion paper the same analytical tool is adopted differently - here we perform non-asymptotic "worst-case" analysis. Simple union bounds are a natural choice for "worst-case" analyses, however their tightness is an issue (and questioned in previous works). Here we focus on a theoretical U-statistical result, which potentially allows us to prove that these union bounds are tight. To our knowledge, this kind of (powerful) result is completely new in the context of CS. This general result applies to a wide variety of parameters, and is related to (Stein-Chen) Poisson approximation. In this paper, we consider i) restricted isometries, and ii) mutual coherence. For the bounded case, we show that k-th order restricted isometry constants have tight union bounds, when the measurements m = \mathcal{O}(k (1 + \log(n/k))). Here we require the restricted isometries to grow linearly in k, however we conjecture that this result can be improved to allow them to be fixed. Also, we show that mutual coherence (with the standard estimate \sqrt{(4\log n)/m}) have very tight union bounds. For coherence, the normalization complicates general discussion, and we consider only Gaussian and Bernoulli cases here.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.