Paper detail

On the XMM-Newton spectra of soft X-ray selected QSOs

We study the XMM-Newton spectra of a sample of 32 soft X-ray selected QSOs. Our goal is to check, using the spectra of moderate redshift (z~1.5), faint (f (0.2-8 keV) > 5x10^-15 cgs) broad-line QSOs, previous claims for either significant intrinsic absorption or spectral hardening at high energies. We derive hardness ratios for all sources and furthermore we perform spectral fits for the 11 brighter sources. The majority of sources have steep spectra (photon index >1.9). We find a few QSOs with large amounts of intrinsic absorption, as high as N_H~10^23 cm-2. We find no strong evidence for spectral hardening above 2 keV. The coadded QSO spectrum is well described by a single power-law with photon index of ~1.9, demonstrating that, on average, any effects of absorption are not important. This suggests that the discrepancy between the X-ray background and the (soft X-ray selected) QSO spectrum holds well at the faint fluxes probed here.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.