Paper detail

On the X-ray properties of submm-selected galaxies

We present an analysis of the X-ray properties of 35 submm galaxies(SMGs) in the CDF-N. Using a sample of robust 850micron-selected galaxies, with accurate positions from Spitzer and/or radio counterparts, we find 16 objects (45+/-8%) with significant X-ray detections in the 2Ms Chandra data. 6 of these SMGs (~17+/-6%) have measured X-ray luminosities or upper limits consistent with those expected based on the far-infrared (FIR) or radio-derived star formation rate (SFR), and hence with the X-rays coming solely from star formation. In another 7 sources (20+/-7%) a dominant AGN contribution to the X-ray emission is required, while in 3 more it is unclear whether stellar process or accretion are responsible. Stacking of the X-ray undetected SMGs reveals a highly significant detection. If due to star formation, this corresponds to an average X-ray derived SFR of ~150 Msun/yr. We deduce that the AGN fraction in SMGs based on X-ray observations is 20-29 (+/-7) %, which is towards the lower limit of previous estimates. Spectral analysis shows that in general the SMGs are not heavily obscured in the X-ray but most of the SMGs classfied as AGN show absorption with N_H in excess of 10^22 cm^-2. Of the secure AGN, the bolometric luminosity appears to be dominated by the AGN in only 3 cases. In ~85% of the SMGs, the X-ray spectrum effectively rules out an AGN contribution that dominates the bolometric emission, even if the AGN is Compton thick. The evidence therefore suggests that intense star formation accounts for both the FIR and X-ray emission in most SMGs. We argue that, rather than having an especially high AGN fraction or duty cycle, SMGs have a high X-ray detection rate at very faint fluxes partly because of their high star formation rates and, in rarer cases, because the submm emission is from an AGN.(abridged)

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.