Paper detail

On the Widom factors for $L_p$ extremal polynomials

We continue our study of the Widom factors for $L_p(μ)$ extremal polynomials initiated in [4]. In this work we characterize sets for which the lower bounds obtained in [4] are saturated, establish continuity of the Widom factors with respect to the measure $μ$, and show that despite the lower bound $[W_{2,n}(μ_K)]^2\geq 2S(μ_K)$ for the equilibrium measure $μ_K$ on a compact set $K\subset\mathbb R$ the general lower bound $[W_{p,n}(μ)]^p\geq S(μ)$ is optimal even for measures $dμ=wdμ_K$ with polynomial weights $w$ on $K\subset\mathbb R$. We also study pull-back measures under polynomial pre-images introduced in [16, 23] and obtain invariance of the Widom factors for such measures. Lastly, we study in detail the Widom factors for orthogonal polynomials with respect to the equilibrium measure on a circular arc and, in particular, find their limit, infimum, and supremum and show that they are strictly monotone increasing with the degree and strictly monotone decreasing with the length of the arc.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.